Paper detail

$B\to π\ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ decays revisited in the standard model

A new estimate is presented of the dileptonic $B$ decays $B\toπ\ell^+\ell^-(\ell=e,μ,τ)$ in naive factorization within the standard-model (SM) framework. Using a combination of several approaches, we investigate the behavior of the $B\to π$ form factors in the entire region of the momentum transfer squared $q^2$. For the vector and scalar form factors, we employ the light cone sum rule (LCSR) with a chiral current correlator to estimate, at twist-2 next-to-leading order (NLO) accuracy, their shapes in small and intermediate kinematical region. Then a simultaneous fit to a Bourrely-Caprini-Lellouch (BCL) parametrization is performed of the sum rule predictions and the corresponding lattice QCD (LQCD) results available at some high $q^2$'s. The same approach is applied for the tensor form factor, except that at large $q^2$ we use as input the LQCD data on the corresponding $B\to K$ form factor in combination with a $SU_F(3)$ symmetry breaking ansatz. Employing the fitted BCL parameterizations, we evaluate, as an illustrative example, several of the observables of the charged decay modes $B^-\toπ^-\ell^+\ell^-$, including the dilepton invariant mass distribution and branching ratio. For the dielectron and dimuon modes, the branching ratios are estimated at $\mathcal{B}(B^-\toπ^-e^+e^-)=(2.263^{+0.227}_{-0.192})\times10^{-8}$ and $\mathcal{B}(B^-\toπ^-μ^+μ^-)=(2.259^{+0.226}_{-0.191}) \times10^{-8}$. The latter shows an excellent agreement with the recent experimental measurement at LHCb and hence puts a stringent constraint on the contribution from possible new physics. We arrive at, for the ditau mode, $\mathcal{B}(B^-\toπ^-τ^+τ^-)=(1.017^{+0.118}_{-0.139})\times10^{-8}$, which is one order of magnitude larger than the existing theoretical predictions.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.