Paper detail

$B \to χ_{c0,2} K$ decays: a model estimation

In this paper, we investigate the vertex corrections and spectator hard scattering contributions to $B \to χ_{c0,2}K$ decays, which has no leading contribution from naive factorization scheme. A non-zero binding energy $b=2m_c-M$ is introduced to regularize the infrared divergence of the vertex part. The spectator diagrams also contain logarithmic and linear infrared divergences, for which we adopt a model dependent parametrization. If we neglect possible strong phases in the hard spectator contributions, we obtain a too small branching ratio for $χ_{c0}K$ while too large one for $χ_{c2}K$, as can be seen from the ratio of the branching ratio of $B^+ \to χ_{c2}K^+$ to that of $B^+ \to χ_{c0} K^+$, which is predicted to be $2.15^{+0.63}_{-0.76}$ in our model, while experimentally it should be about 0.1 or even smaller. But a closer examination shows that, assuming large strong phases difference between the twist-2 and twist-3 spectator terms, together with a slightly larger spectator infrared cutoff parameter $Λ_h$, it is possible to accommodate the experimental data. This shows that, for $B\to χ_{c0,2}K$ decays with no factorizable contributions, QCDF seems capable of producing decay rates close to experiments, in contrast to the $B\to J/ψK$ decay which is dominated by the factorizable contributions.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.