Paper detail

$B_s \rightarrow D_s^*$ Form Factors for the full $q^2$ range from Lattice QCD

We compute the Standard Model semileptonic vector and axial-vector form factors for $B_s\to D_s^*$ decay across the full $q^2$ range using lattice QCD. We use the Highly Improved Staggered Quark (HISQ) action for all valence quarks, enabling us to normalise weak currents nonperturbatively. We use gluon field configurations including $u$, $d$, $s$ and $c$ HISQ sea quarks and multiple HISQ heavy quarks with masses from the $c$ mass up to that of the $b$ on our finest lattices. We determine the physical form factors, with which we construct the differential and total rates for $Γ(B_s^0\to D_s^{*-}\ell^+ν_\ell)$. We find $Γ_{\ell=e}/|η_\mathrm{EW}V_{cb}|^2=2.07(17)_\mathrm{latt}(2)_\mathrm{EM}\times 10^{13} ~\mathrm{s}^{-1}$, $Γ_{\ell=μ}/|η_\mathrm{EW}V_{cb}|^2=2.06(16)_\mathrm{latt}(2)_\mathrm{EM}\times 10^{13} ~\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ and $Γ_{\ell=τ}/|η_\mathrm{EW}V_{cb}|^2=5.14(37)_\mathrm{latt}(5)_\mathrm{EM}\times 10^{12} ~\mathrm{s}^{-1}$, where $η_\mathrm{EW}$ contains the electroweak correction to $G_F$, the first uncertainty is from our lattice calculation, and the second allows for long-distance QED effects. We compute the ratio $R(D_s^{*-})\equiv Γ_{\ell=τ}/Γ_{\ell=μ}=0.2490(60)_\mathrm{latt}(35)_\mathrm{EM}$ and obtain a value for the ratio of decay rates $Γ_{\ell=μ}(B_s\to D_s)/Γ_{\ell=μ}(B_s\to D_s^*)=0.443(40)_\mathrm{latt}(4)_\mathrm{EM}$, which agrees well with recent LHCb results. We determine $|V_{cb}|=42.2 (1.5)_\mathrm{latt}(1.7)_\mathrm{exp}(0.4)_\mathrm{EM} \times 10^{-3}$ by combining our lattice results across the full q^2 range with experimental results from LHCb. A comparison of our results to the normalised differential decay rate from LHCb shows good agreement. We also test the impact of new physics couplings on observables sensitive to lepton flavor universality violation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.