Paper detail

B Decays in the Standard Model - Status and Perspectives

These lectures review some of the progress made in the quantitative understanding of B decays. The emphasis here is on applications of QCD using perturbative and non-perturbative techniques. In some cases, however, phenomenological models must at present be invoked to make meaningful comparison with data. The resulting picture is consistent with the standard model (SM) and this agreement is quantified in terms of the branching ratios, mixing probabilities, and lifetimes which measure the charge current and effective flavour changing neutral current transitions involving B hadrons. This, in turn, enables a determination of five of the nine elements of the quark mixing matrix. We discuss several proposals on improving the precision on the parameters of this matrix in forthcoming experiments. Issues intimately related to the quark mixing matrix such as the profile of the unitarity triangle and CP-violating asymmetries in B decays are discussed. In particular, we emphasize the role of rare B decays and B^0 - $\overline{B^0}$ mixings in testing the SM quantitatively and in searching for physics beyond the SM.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.