Paper detail

$b \bar b$ Kinematic Correlations in Cold Nuclear Matter

Background: The LHCb Collaboration has studied a number of kinematic correlations between $B$-hadron pairs through their subsequent decays to $J/ψ$ pairs at 7 and 8 TeV for four minimum values of the $J/ψ$ $p_T$. Purpose: In this work, these measurements are compared to calculations of $b \bar b$ pairs and their hadronization and inclusive decays to $J/ψJ/ψ$ are compared to the same observables. Potential cold matter effects on the $b \bar b$ pair observables are discussed to determine which are most likely to provide insights about the system and why. Methods: The calculations, employing the exclusive HVQMNR code, assume the same intrinsic $k_T$-broadening and fragmentation as in [R. Vogt, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 98} (2018) 034907]. The pair distributions presented by LHCb are calculated in this approach, both for the parent $b \bar b$ and the $J/ψJ/ψ$ pairs produced in their decay. The sensitivity of the results to the intrinsic $k_T$ broadening is shown. The theoretical uncertainties due to the $b$ quark mass and scale variations on both the initial $b \bar b$ pairs and the resulting $J/ψ$ pairs are also shown. Possible effects due to the presence of the nucleus are studied by increasing the size of the $k_T$ broadening and modification of the fragmentation parameter. Results: Good agreement with the LHCb data is found for all observables. The parent $b \bar b$ distributions are more sensitive to the $k_T$ broadening than are the final-state $J/ψ$ pairs. Conclusions: Next-to-leading order calculations with $k_T$ broadening, as in [R. Vogt, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 98} (2018) 034907], can describe all correlated observables. Multiple measurements of correlated observables are sensitive to different nuclear effects which can help distinguish between them.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.