Paper detail

Azimuthal Anisotropy Relative to the Participant Plane from AMPT in Central p+Au, d+Au, and $^{3}$He+Au Collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV

Recent data from p+p and p+Pb collisions at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), and d+Au and $^3$He+Au collisions at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) reveal patterns that---when observed in the collision of heavy nuclei---are commonly interpreted as indicators of a locally equilibrated system in collective motion. The comparison of these data sets, including the forthcoming results from p+Au and p+Al collisions at RHIC, will help to elucidate the geometric dependence of such patterns. It has recently been shown that A-Multi-Phase-Transport-Model (AMPT) can describe some of these features in LHC data with a parton-parton scattering cross section comparable to that required to describe A+A data. In this paper, we extend these studies by incorporating a full wave function description of the $^3$He nucleus to calculate elliptical and triangular anisotropy moments $v_2$ and $v_3$ for p+Au, d+Au and $^3$He+Au collisions at the RHIC top energy of 200 GeV. We find reasonable agreement with the measured $v_2$ in d+Au and $^3$He+Au and $v_3$ in $^3$He+Au for transverse momentum ($p_{T}$) $\lesssim$ 1 GeV/c, but underestimate these measurements for higher values of \pt. We predict a pattern of coefficients ($v_{2}$, $v_{3}$) for \pau, dominated by differences in the number of induced local hot spots (i.e. one, two, or three) arising from intrinsic geometry. Additionally, we examine how this substantial azimuthal anisotropy accrues during each individual evolutionary phase of the collision in the AMPT model. The possibility of a simultaneous description of RHIC- and LHC-energy data, the suite of different geometries, and high multiplicity p+p data is an exciting possibility for understanding the underlying physics in these systems.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.