Paper detail

Azimuth multipoles vs minimum-bias jets in 2D angular correlations on $η$ and $ϕ$

Angular correlations measured in \pp and heavy ion collisions at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) include a same-side (SS) 2D peak. In peripheral åand p-p collisions the SS peak properties are consistent with predicted minimum-bias jet correlations. However, in more-central \auau collisions the SS peak becomes elongated on pseudorapidity $η$. Arguments have been proposed to explain the SS peak $η$ elongation in terms of possibly-fluctuating initial-state geometry multipoles coupled with radial flow to produce final-state momentum-space multipoles. Such arguments are based on Fourier decomposition of 2D angular correlations projected onto 1D azimuth. In this analysis we show that measured correlation structure on $η$ (large curvatures) establishes a clear distinction between the SS 2D (jet) peak and 1D multipoles. Measured 2D peak systematics can predict inferred 1D Fourier amplitudes interpreted as "higher harmonic flows." But 1D Fourier amplitudes alone cannot describe 2D angular correlations. The SS 2D peak remains a unique structure which can be interpreted in terms of parton scattering and fragmentation in all cases.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.