Paper detail

Axioms of adaptivity for separate marking

Mixed finite element methods with flux errors in $H(div)$-norms and div-least-squares finite element methods require a separate marking strategy in obligatory adaptive mesh-refining. The refinement indicator $σ^2(\mathcal T,K)=η^2(\mathcal T,K)+μ^2(K)$ of a finite element domain $K$ in an admissible triangulation $\mathcal T$ consists of some residual-based error estimator $η(\mathcal T,K)$ with some reduction property under local mesh-refining and some data approximation error $μ(K)$. Separate marking means either Dörfler marking if $μ^2(\mathcal T) \leq κη^2(\mathcal T)$ or otherwise an optimal data approximation algorithm runs with controlled accuracy as established in [Carstensen, Rabus, Math.Comp. 2011; Rabus, J.Numer.Math. 2015]. The axioms are abstract and sufficient conditions on the estimators $η(\mathcal T,K)$ and data approximation errors $μ(K)$ for optimal asymptotic convergence rates. The enfolded set of axioms simplifies \cite{CFP14} for collective marking, treats separate marking established for the first time in an abstract framework, generalizes [Carstensen, Park, SIAM J.Numer.Anal. 2015] for least-squares schemes, and extends [Carstensen, Rabus, Math.Comp. 2011] to the mixed FEM with flux error control in $H(div)$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.