Paper detail

Axiomatization of Mechanics

The problem of axiomatization of physics formulated by Hilbert as early as 1900 and known as the Sixth Problem of Hilbert is nowadays even more topical than at the moment of its formulation. Axiomatic inconsistency of classic, quantum, and geometrized relativistic physics of the general relativistic theory does not in the least fade away, but on the contrary, becomes more pronounced each year. This naturally evokes the following questions: 1. Is it possible, without drastically changing the mathematics apparatus, to set up the axiomatics of physics so as to transform physics, being presently a multitude of unmatched theories with inconsistent axiomatics, into an integrated science? 2. Is it possible, maybe through expanding their scopes, to generalize of transform the existing axiomatics into an integral system of axioms in such a manner that existing axiomatics of inconsistent theories would follow there from as a particular case?

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.