Paper detail

Axiomatic framework for the BGG Category O

We introduce a general axiomatic framework for algebras with triangular decomposition, which allows for a systematic study of the Bernstein-Gelfand-Gelfand Category $\mathcal{O}$. The framework is stated via three relatively simple axioms; algebras satisfying them are termed "regular triangular algebras (RTAs)". These encompass a large class of algebras in the literature, including (a) generalized Weyl algebras, (b) symmetrizable Kac-Moody Lie algebras $\mathfrak{g}$, (c) quantum groups $U_q(\mathfrak{g})$ over "lattices with possible torsion", (d) infinitesimal Hecke algebras, (e) higher rank Virasoro algebras, and others. In order to incorporate these special cases under a common setting, our theory distinguishes between roots and weights, and does not require the Cartan subalgebra to be a Hopf algebra. We also allow RTAs to have roots in arbitrary monoids rather than root lattices, and the roots of the Borel subalgebras to lie in cones with respect to a strict subalgebra of the Cartan subalgebra. These relaxations of the triangular structure have not been explored in the literature. We then study the BGG Category $\mathcal{O}$ over an RTA. In order to work with general RTAs - and also bypass the use of central characters - we introduce conditions termed the "Conditions (S)", under which distinguished subcategories of Category $\mathcal{O}$ possess desirable homological properties, including: (a) being a finite length, abelian, self-dual category; (b) having enough projectives/injectives; or (c) being a highest weight category satisfying BGG Reciprocity. We discuss whether the above examples satisfy the various Conditions (S). We also discuss two new examples of RTAs that cannot be studied using previous theories of Category $\mathcal{O}$, but require the full scope of our framework. These include the first construction of algebras for which the "root lattice" is non-abelian.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.