Paper detail

Avoiding bias in cards cryptography

We outline the need for stricter requirements for unconditionally secure cryptographic protocols inspired by the Russian Cards problem. A new requirement CA4 is proposed that checks for bias in single card occurrence in announcements consisting of alternatives for players' holdings of cards. This requirement CA4 is shown to be equivalent to an alternative requirement CA5. All announcements found to satisfy CA4 are 2-designs. We also show that all binary designs are 3-designs. Instead of avoiding bias in announcements produced by such protocols, one may as well apply unbiased protocols such that patterns in announcements become meaningless. We gave two examples of such protocols for card deal parameters (3,3,1), i.e. two of the players hold three cards, and the remaining player, playing the role of eavesdropper, holds a single card.

preprint2007arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.