Paper detail

Average value of solutions of the bipartite quadratic assignment problem and linkages to domination analysis

In this paper we study the complexity and domination analysis in the context of the \emph{bipartite quadratic assignment problem}. Two variants of the problem, denoted by BQAP1 and BQAP2, are investigated. A formula for calculating the average objective function value $\mathcal{A}$ of all solutions is presented whereas computing the median objective function value is shown to be NP-hard. We show that any heuristic algorithm that produces a solution with objective function value at most $\mathcal{A}$ has the domination ratio at least $\frac{1}{mn}$. Analogous results for the standard \emph{quadratic assignment problem} is an open question. We show that computing a solution whose objective function value is no worse than that of $n^mm^n-{\lceil\frac{n}α\rceil}^{\lceil\frac{m}α\rceil}{\lceil\frac{m}α\rceil}^{\lceil\frac{n}α\rceil}$ solutions of BQAP1 or $m^mn^n-{\lceil\frac{m}α\rceil}^{\lceil\frac{m}α\rceil}{\lceil\frac{n}α\rceil}^{\lceil\frac{n}α\rceil}$ solutions of BQAP2, is NP-hard for any fixed natural numbers $a$ and $b$ such that $α=\frac{a}{b}>1$. However, a solution with the domination number $Ω(m^{n-1}n^{m-1}+m^{n+1}n+mn^{m+1})$ for BQAP1 and $Ω(m^{m-1}n^{n-1}+m^2n^{n}+m^mn^2)$ for BQAP2, can be found in $O(m^3n^3)$ time.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.