Paper detail

Average Stretch Factor: How Low Does It Go?

In a geometric graph, $G$, the \emph{stretch factor} between two vertices, $u$ and $w$, is the ratio between the Euclidean length of the shortest path from $u$ to $w$ in $G$ and the Euclidean distance between $u$ and $w$. The \emph{average stretch factor} of $G$ is the average stretch factor taken over all pairs of vertices in $G$. We show that, for any constant dimension, $d$, and any set, $V$, of $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$, there exists a geometric graph with vertex set $V$, that has $O(n)$ edges, and that has average stretch factor $1+ o_n(1)$. More precisely, the average stretch factor of this graph is $1+O((\log n/n)^{1/(2d+1)})$. We complement this upper-bound with a lower bound: There exist $n$-point sets in $\mathbb{R}^2$ for which any graph with $O(n)$ edges has average stretch factor $1+Ω(1/\sqrt{n})$. Bounds of this type are not possible for the more commonly studied worst-case stretch factor. In particular, there exists point sets, $V$, such that any graph with worst-case stretch factor $1+o_n(1)$ has a superlinear number of edges.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.