Paper detail

Average performance of the sparsest approximation using a general dictionary

We consider the minimization of the number of non-zero coefficients (the $\ell_0$ "norm") of the representation of a data set in terms of a dictionary under a fidelity constraint. (Both the dictionary and the norm defining the constraint are arbitrary.) This (nonconvex) optimization problem naturally leads to the sparsest representations, compared with other functionals instead of the $\ell_0$ "norm". Our goal is to measure the sets of data yielding a $K$-sparse solution--i.e. involving $K$ non-zero components. Data are assumed uniformly distributed on a domain defined by any norm--to be chosen by the user. A precise description of these sets of data is given and relevant bounds on the Lebesgue measure of these sets are derived. They naturally lead to bound the probability of getting a $K$-sparse solution. We also express the expectation of the number of non-zero components. We further specify these results in the case of the Euclidean norm, the dictionary being arbitrary.

preprint2008arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.