Paper detail

Average number of flips in pancake sorting

We are given a stack of pancakes of different sizes and the only allowed operation is to take several pancakes from top and flip them. The unburnt version requires the pancakes to be sorted by their sizes at the end, while in the burnt version they additionally need to be oriented burnt-side down. We present an algorithm with the average number of flips, needed to sort a stack of n burnt pancakes, equal to 7n/4+O(1) and a randomized algorithm for the unburnt version with at most 17n/12+O(1) flips on average. In addition, we show that in the burnt version, the average number of flips of any algorithm is at least n+Ω(n/log n) and conjecture that some algorithm can reach n+Θ(n/log n). We also slightly increase the lower bound on g(n), the minimum number of flips needed to sort the worst stack of n burnt pancakes. This bound, together with the upper bound found by Heydari and Sudborough in 1997, gives the exact number of flips to sort the previously conjectured worst stack -I_n for n=3 mod 4 and n>=15. Finally we present exact values of f(n) up to n=19 and of g(n) up to n=17 and disprove a conjecture of Cohen and Blum by showing that the burnt stack -I_{15} is not the worst one for n=15.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.