Paper detail

Avalanches and perturbation theory in the random-field Ising model

Perturbation theory for the random-field Ising model (RFIM) has the infamous attribute that it predicts at all orders a dimensional-reduction property for the critical behavior that turns out to be wrong in low dimension. Guided by our previous work based on the nonperturbative functional renormalization group (NP-FRG), we show that one can still make some use of the perturbation theory for a finite range of dimension below the upper critical dimension, d=6. The new twist is to account for the influence of large-scale zero-temperature events known as avalanches. These avalanches induce nonanalyticities in the field dependence of the correlation functions and renormalized vertices, and we compute in a loop expansion the eigenvalue associated with the corresponding anomalous operator. The outcome confirms the NP-FRG prediction that the dimensional-reduction fixed point correctly describes the dominant critical scaling of the RFIM above some dimension close to 5 but not below.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.