Paper detail

Autoregressive Transformers for Disruption Prediction in Nuclear Fusion Plasmas

The physical sciences require models tailored to specific nuances of different dynamics. In this work, we study outcome predictions in nuclear fusion tokamaks, where a major challenge are \textit{disruptions}, or the loss of plasma stability with damaging implications for the tokamak. Although disruptions are difficult to model using physical simulations, machine learning (ML) models have shown promise in predicting these phenomena. Here, we first study several variations on masked autoregressive transformers, achieving an average of 5\% increase in Area Under the Receiving Operating Characteristic metric above existing methods. We then compare transformer models to limited context neural networks in order to shed light on the ``memory'' of plasma effected by tokamaks controls. With these model comparisons, we argue for the persistence of a memory throughout the plasma \textit{in the context of tokamaks} that our model exploits.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.