Paper detail

Automorphic Gluing

We prove a gluing theorem on the automorphic side of the geometric Langlands correspondence: roughly speaking, we show that the difference between $\mathrm{DMod}(\mathrm{Bun}_G)$ and its full subcategory $\mathrm{DMod}(\mathrm{Bun}_G)^\mathrm{temp}$ of tempered objects is compensated by the categories $\mathrm{DMod}(\mathrm{Bun}_M)^\mathrm{temp}$ for all standard Levi subgroups $M \subsetneq G$. This theorem is designed to match exactly with the spectral gluing theorem, an analogous result occurring on the other side of the geometric Langlands conjecture. Along the way, we state and prove several facts that might be of independent interest. For instance, for any parabolic $P \subseteq G$, we show that the functors $\mathrm{CT}_{P,*}:\mathrm{DMod}(\mathrm{Bun}_G) \to \mathrm{DMod}(\mathrm{Bun}_M)$ and $\mathrm{Eis}_{P,*}: \mathrm{DMod}(\mathrm{Bun}_M) \to \mathrm{DMod}(\mathrm{Bun}_G)$ preserve tempered objects, whereas the standard Eisenstein functor $\mathrm{Eis}_{P,!}$ preserves anti-tempered objects.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.