Paper detail

Automatic winning shifts

To each one-dimensional subshift $X$, we may associate a winning shift $W(X)$ which arises from a combinatorial game played on the language of $X$. Previously it has been studied what properties of $X$ does $W(X)$ inherit. For example, $X$ and $W(X)$ have the same factor complexity and if $X$ is a sofic subshift, then $W(X)$ is also sofic. In this paper, we develop a notion of automaticity for $W(X)$, that is, we propose what it means that a vector representation of $W(X)$ is accepted by a finite automaton. Let $S$ be an abstract numeration system such that addition with respect to $S$ is a rational relation. Let $X$ be a subshift generated by an $S$-automatic word. We prove that as long as there is a bound on the number of nonzero symbols in configurations of $W(X)$ (which follows from $X$ having sublinear factor complexity), then $W(X)$ is accepted by a finite automaton, which can be effectively constructed from the description of $X$. We provide an explicit automaton when $X$ is generated by certain automatic words such as the Thue-Morse word.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.