Paper detail

Automatic Synthesis of Random Generators for Numerically Constrained Algebraic Recursive Types

In program verification, constraint-based random testing is a powerful technique which aims at generating random test cases that satisfy functional properties of a program. However, on recursive constrained data-structures (e.g., sorted lists, binary search trees, quadtrees), and, more generally, when the structures are highly constrained, generating uniformly distributed inputs is difficult. In this paper, we present Testify: a framework in which users can define algebraic data-types decorated with high-level constraints. These constraints are interpreted as membership predicates that restrict the set of inhabitants of the type. From these definitions, Testify automatically synthesises a partial specification of the program so that no function produces a value that violates the constraints (e.g. a binary search tree where nodes are improperly inserted). Our framework augments the original program with tests that check such properties. To achieve that, we automatically produce uniform random samplers that generate values which satisfy the constraints, and verifies the validity of the outputs of the tested functions. By generating the shape of a recursive data-structure using Boltzmann sampling and generating evenly distributed finite domain variable values using constraint solving, our framework guarantees size-constrained uniform sampling of test cases. We provide use-cases of our framework on several key data structures that are of practical relevance for developers. Experiments show encouraging results.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.