Paper detail

Automatic Segmentation, Feature Extraction and Comparison of Healthy and Stroke Cerebral Vasculature

Accurate segmentation of cerebral vasculature and a quantitative assessment of cerebrovascular morphology is critical to various diagnostic and therapeutic purposes and is pertinent to studying brain health and disease. However, this is still a challenging task due to the complexity of the vascular imaging data. We propose an automated method for cerebral vascular segmentation without the need of any manual intervention as well as a method to skeletonize the binary volume to extract vascular geometric features which can characterize vessel structure. We combine a probabilistic vessel-enhancing filtering with an active-contour technique to segment magnetic resonance and computed tomography angiograms (MRA and CTA) and subsequently extract the vessel centerlines and diameters to calculate the geometrical properties of the vasculature. Our method was validated using a 3D phantom of the Circle-of-Willis region with 84% mean Dice Similarity and 85% mean Pearson Correlation with minimal modified Hausdorff distance error. We applied this method to a dataset of healthy subjects and stroke patients and present a quantitative comparison between them. We found significant differences in the geometric features including total length (2.88 +/- 0.38 m for healthy and 2.20 +/- 0.67 m for stroke), volume (40.18 +/- 25.55 ml for healthy and 34.43 +/- 21.83 ml for stroke), tortuosity (3.24 +/- 0.88 rad/cm for healthy and 5.80 +/- 0.92 rad/cm for stroke) and fractality (box dimension 1.36 +/- 0.28 for healthy vs. 1.69 +/- 0.20 for stroke). This technique can be applied on any imaging modality and can be used in the future to automatically obtain the 3D segmented vasculature for diagnosis and treatment planning of Stroke and other cerebrovascular diseases (CVD) in the clinic and also to study the morphological changes caused by various CVD.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.

Automatic Segmentation, Feature Extraction and Comparison of Healthy and Stroke Cerebral Vasculature | BZPEER | BZPEER