Paper detail

Automatic Non-Invasive Isolation of Respiratory Cycles

In this paper, we introduce a novel algorithm designed to isolate individual respiratory cycles on a thoracic respiratory inductance plethysmography signal. The algorithm locates breaths using signal processing and statistical methods and enables the analysis of sleep data on an individual breath level. The algorithm was evaluated on 7.3 hours of hand-annotated data, or 8782 individual breaths in total, and was estimated to correctly isolate 94% of respiratory cycles while producing false positives that amount to only 5% of the total number of detections. The algorithm was specifically evaluated on data containing a great number of sleep-disordered breathing events. We found that the algorithm did not suffer in terms of accuracy when detecting breaths in the presence of sleep-disordered breathing. The algorithm was also evaluated across a large set of participants, and we found that the accuracy of the algorithm was consistent across participants. This algorithm is finally made public via an open-source Python library.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.