Paper detail

Automatic morphological classification of galaxies: convolutional autoencoder and bagging-based multiclustering model

In order to obtain morphological information of unlabeled galaxies, we present an unsupervised machine-learning (UML) method for morphological classification of galaxies, which can be summarized as two aspects: (1) the methodology of convolutional autoencoder (CAE) is used to reduce the dimensions and extract features from the imaging data; (2) the bagging-based multiclustering model is proposed to obtain the classifications with high confidence at the cost of rejecting the disputed sources that are inconsistently voted. We apply this method on the sample of galaxies with $H<24.5$ in CANDELS. Galaxies are clustered into 100 groups, each contains galaxies with analogous characteristics. To explore the robustness of the morphological classifications, we merge 100 groups into five categories by visual verification, including spheroid, early-type disk, late-type disk, irregular, and unclassifiable. After eliminating the unclassifiable category and the sources with inconsistent voting, the purity of the remaining four subclasses are significantly improved. Massive galaxies ($M_*>10^{10}M_\odot$) are selected to investigate the connection with other physical properties. The classification scheme separates galaxies well in the U-V and V-J color space and Gini-$M_{20}$ space. The gradual tendency of Sérsic indexes and effective radii is shown from the spheroid subclass to the irregular subclass. It suggests that the combination of CAE and multi-clustering strategy is an effective method to cluster galaxies with similar features and can yield high-quality morphological classifications. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of UML in morphological analysis that would develop and serve the future observations made with China Space Station telescope.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.