Paper detail

Automatic Modelling of Human Musculoskeletal Ligaments -- Framework Overview and Model Quality Evaluation

Accurate segmentation of connective soft tissues is still a challenging task, which hinders the generation of corresponding geometric models for biomechanical computations. Alternatively, one could predict ligament insertion sites and then approximate the shapes, based on anatomical knowledge and morphological studies. Here, we describe a corresponding integrated framework for the automatic modelling of human musculoskeletal ligaments. We combine statistical shape modelling with geometric algorithms to automatically identify insertion sites, based on which geometric surface and volume meshes are created. For demonstrating a clinical use case, the framework has been applied to generate models of the interosseous membrane in the forearm. For the adoption to the forearm anatomy, ligament insertion sites in the statistical model were defined according to anatomical predictions following an approach proposed in prior work. For evaluation we compared the generated sites, as well as the ligament shapes, to data obtained from a cadaveric study, involving five forearms with a total of 15 ligaments. Our framework permitted the creation of 3D models approximating ligaments' shapes with good fidelity. However, we found that the statistical model trained with the state-of-the-art prediction of the insertion sites was not always reliable. Using that model, average mean square errors as well as Hausdorff distances of the meshes increased by more than one order of magnitude, as compared to employing the known insertion locations of the cadaveric study. Using the latter an average mean square error of 0.59 mm and an average Hausdorff distance of less than 7 mm resulted, for the complete set of ligaments. In conclusion, the presented approach for generating ligament shapes from insertion points appears to be feasible but the detection of the insertion sites with a SSM is too inaccurate.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.