Paper detail

Automatic learning of hydrogen-bond fixes in an AMBER RNA force field

The capability of current force fields to reproduce RNA structural dynamics is limited. Several methods have been developed to take advantage of experimental data in order to enforce agreement with experiments. We herein extend an existing framework, which allows arbitrarily chosen force-field correction terms to be fitted by quantification of the discrepancy between observables back-calculated from simulation and corresponding experiments. We apply a robust regularization protocol to avoid overfitting, and additionally introduce and compare a number of different regularization strategies, namely L1-, L2-, Kish Size-, Relative Kish Size- and Relative Entropy-penalties. The training set includes a GACC tetramer as well as more challenging systems, namely gcGAGAgc and gcUUCGgc RNA tetraloops. Specific intramolecular hydrogen bonds in the AMBER RNA force field are corrected with automatically determined parameters that we call gHBfix$_{opt}$. A validation involving a separate simulation of a system present in the training set (gcUUCGgc) and new systems not seen during training (CAAU and UUUU tetramers) displays improvements regarding native population of the tetraloop as well as good agreement with NMR-experiments for tetramers when using the new parameters. Then we simulate folded RNAs (a kink-turn and L1 stalk rRNA) including hydrogen bond types not sufficiently present in the training set. This allows a final modification of the parameter set which is named gHBfix21 and is suggested to be applicable to a wider range of RNA systems.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.