Paper detail

Automated Optical Density Normalization for Myelin Quantification: Cross-Modal Validation with 7T Ex Vivo MRI

White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are bright regions on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and are associated with cerebrovascular pathology and neurodegeneration, including myelin loss. While Luxol Fast Blue histopathology provides visualization of myelin integrity, quantitative analysis requires measuring Optical Density as a proxy for myelin concentration. However, differences in laboratory protocols and tissue processing introduce staining variability that acts as systematic noise, obscuring the biological signal and preventing consistent comparison across histology runs. To address this, we developed an automated pipeline that identifies reference (non-pathologic) regions in whole-slide images to compute normalized Optical Density heatmaps. We validated this approach through two complementary evaluations: (1) comparison against expert ratings of myelin loss severity, and (2) cross-modal spatial comparison with co-registered 7T ex vivo MRI for voxel-wise evaluation within white matter regions. The pipeline's reference selection showed strong concordance with expert-identified reference regions, and normalized Optical Density demonstrated a substantially stronger correlation with MRI signal intensity than raw measurements. This correlation persisted within WMH, confirming that the pipeline captures continuous myelin pathology rather than merely the presence or absence of myelin loss contrast. By mitigating staining artifacts, this pipeline provides a robust, validated framework for quantitative cross-modal comparison, establishing a critical methodological foundation for future translation to in vivo myelin mapping and biomarker discovery.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.