Paper detail

Automated Inline Analysis of Myocardial Perfusion MRI with Deep Learning

Recent development of quantitative myocardial blood flow (MBF) mapping allows direct evaluation of absolute myocardial perfusion, by computing pixel-wise flow maps. Clinical studies suggest quantitative evaluation would be more desirable for objectivity and efficiency. Objective assessment can be further facilitated by segmenting the myocardium and automatically generating reports following the AHA model. This will free user interaction for analysis and lead to a 'one-click' solution to improve workflow. This paper proposes a deep neural network based computational workflow for inline myocardial perfusion analysis. Adenosine stress and rest perfusion scans were acquired from three hospitals. Training set included N=1,825 perfusion series from 1,034 patients. Independent test set included 200 scans from 105 patients. Data were consecutively acquired at each site. A convolution neural net (CNN) model was trained to provide segmentation for LV cavity, myocardium and right ventricular by processing incoming 2D+T perfusion Gd series. Model outputs were compared to manual ground-truth for accuracy of segmentation and flow measures derived on global and per-sector basis. The trained models were integrated onto MR scanners for effective inference. Segmentation accuracy and myocardial flow measures were compared between CNN models and manual ground-truth. The mean Dice ratio of CNN derived myocardium was 0.93 +/- 0.04. Both global flow and per-sector values showed no significant difference, compared to manual results. The AHA 16 segment model was automatically generated and reported on the MR scanner. As a result, the fully automated analysis of perfusion flow mapping was achieved. This solution was integrated on the MR scanner, enabling 'one-click' analysis and reporting of myocardial blood flow.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.