Paper detail

Autofib Redshift Survey - I. Evolution of the Galaxy Luminosity Function

We present a detailed determination of the restframe B-band galaxy luminosity function (LF) as a function of redshift and star formation activity from z=0 to z=0.75. The dataset used for this purpose is a combined sample of over 1700 redshifts spanning a wide range in apparent magnitude, 11.5<B<24.0, which we term the Autofib Redshift Survey. The sample includes various earlier magnitude-limited surveys constructed by our team as well as a new survey of 1026 redshifts measured for galaxies at intermediate magnitudes. The large range in apparent magnitude sampled allows us to investigate both the nature of the LF at low redshift (z<0.1) and possible evolution in its shape to z=0.75. We find that earlier bright surveys have underestimated the absolute normalisation of the LF. Because the shape of the local LF does not change with the survey apparent magnitude limit, it seems unlikely that the local deficiency arises from an underestimated population of low luminosity galaxies. Furthermore, surface brightness losses cannot be significant unless they conspire to retain the LF shape over a variety of detection thresholds. Our data directly demonstrates that the B-band LF evolves with redshift. This evolution is best represented as a steepening of the faint-end slope of the LF, from alpha=-1.1 at low redshift to alpha=-1.5 at z=0.5. Using [OII] emission as an indicator of star formation activity, we show that the LF of quiescent galaxies has remained largely unchanged since z=0.5, whereas the luminosity density of star-forming galaxies has declined by nearly a factor of 2. The steepening of the overall LF with lookback time is a direct consequence of the increasing space density of blue star-forming galaxies at moderate redshifts.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.