Paper detail

Autocorrelations of stellar light and mass in the low-redshift Universe

The final data release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) provides reliable photometry and spectroscopy for about half a million galaxies with median redshift 0.09. Here we use these data to estimate projected autocorrelation functions w_p(r_p) for the light of galaxies in the five SDSS photometric bands. Comparison with the analogous stellar mass autocorrelation, estimated in a previous paper, shows that stellar luminosity is less strongly clustered than stellar mass in all bands and on all scales. Over the full nonlinear range 10 kpc/h < r_p < 10 Mpc/h our autocorrelation estimates are extremely well represented by power laws. The parameters of the corresponding spatial functions ξ(r) = (r/r_0)^γvary systematically from r_0=4.5 Mpc/h and γ=-1.74 for the bluest band (the u band) to r_0=5.8 Mpc/h and γ=-1.83 for the reddest one (the z band). These may be compared with r_0=6.1 Mpc/h and γ=-1.84 for the stellar mass. Ratios of w_p(r_p) between two given wavebands are proportional to the mean colour of correlated stars at projected distance r_p from a randomly chosen star. The ratio of the stellar mass and luminosity autocorrelations measures an analogous mean stellar mass-to-light ratio (M*/L). All colours get redder and all mass-to-light ratios get larger with decreasing r_p, with the amplitude of the effects decreasing strongly to redder passbands. Even for the u-band the effects are quite modest, with maximum shifts of about 0.1 in u-g and about 25% in M*/L_u. These trends provide a precise characterisation of the well-known dependence of stellar populations on environment.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.