Paper detail

Authentic Science Experiences with STEM Datasets: Post-secondary Results and Potential Gender Influences

Background: Dataset skills are used in STEM fields from healthcare work to astronomy research. Few fields explicitly teach students the skills to analyze datasets, and yet the increasing push for authentic science implies these skills should be taught. Purpose: The overarching motivation is to understand learning of dataset skills within an astronomy context. Specifically, when participants work with a 200-entry Google Sheets dataset of astronomical data about quasars, what are they learning, how are they learning it, and who is doing the learning? Sample: The authors studied a matched set of participants (n=87) consisting of 54 university undergraduate students (34 male, 18 female), and 33 science educators (16 male, 17 female). Design and methods: Participants explored a three-phase dataset activity and were given an eight-question multiple-choice pre/post-test covering skills of analyzing datasets and astronomy content, with questions spanning Bloom's Taxonomy. Pre/post-test scores were compared and a t-test performed for subsamples by population. Results: Participants exhibited learning of both dataset skills and astronomy content, indicating that dataset skills can be learned through this astronomy activity. Participants exhibited gains in both recall and synthesis questions, indicating learning is non-sequential. Female undergraduate students exhibited lower levels of learning than other populations. Conclusions: Implications of the study include a stronger dataset focus in post-secondary STEM education and among science educators, and the need for further investigation into how instructors can ameliorate the challenges faced by female undergraduate students.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.