Paper detail

AuditShare: Sensitive Data Sharing with Reliable Leaker Identification

As Personally Identifiable Information (PII) data sharing among multiple parties becomes increasingly common, so does the potential for data leakage. As required by new data protection regulations and laws, when PII leakage occurs, one must be able to reliably identify the leaking sources. Existing solutions utilize watermark technologies or data object allocation strategies to differentiate the data shared with different parties to identify potential leakers. However, these solutions lose their effectiveness under several attack scenarios, e.g., a data sender may leak the data and a receiver may deny the reception of certain shared data. Worse yet, multiple receivers might collude and apply a set of operations such as intersection, complement, and union to their received datasets before leaking them, making the task of leaker identification even more difficult. In this paper, we propose AuditShare, a PII dataset sharing system with reliable leaking source identification. Firstly, taking advantage of the intrinsic properties of PII data, AuditShare allocates data objects to individual sharing parties by PII attributes. Secondly, AuditShare obliviously transfers data between the sender and each receiver and uses a Merkle Tree as an immutable record of the sharing. Thirdly, a knowledge-based identification algorithm is proposed to identify a guilty sender or colluding/non-colluding receivers. Through our evaluation, we show that: (i) With a modest amount of leaked data, AuditShare can accurately (accuracy>99.99%) and undeniably identify all the guilty parties in different cases; (ii) It only takes 0.5 second to share 100,000 data objects in AuditShare, which is practical in real-world deployment.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.