Paper detail

Attractor Stability in Finite Asynchronous Biological System Models

We present mathematical techniques for exhaustive studies of long-term dynamics of asynchronous biological system models. Specifically, we extend the notion of $κ$-equivalence developed for graph dynamical systems to support systematic analysis of all possible attractor configurations that can be generated when varying the asynchronous update order (Macauley and Mortveit (2009)). We extend earlier work by Veliz-Cuba and Stigler (2011), Goles et al. (2014), and others by comparing long-term dynamics up to topological conjugation: rather than comparing the exact states and their transitions on attractors, we only compare the attractor structures. In general, obtaining this information is computationally intractable. Here, we adapt and apply combinatorial theory for dynamical systems to develop computational methods that greatly reduce this computational cost. We give a detailed algorithm and apply it to ($i$) the lac operon model for Escherichia coli proposed by Veliz-Cuba and Stigler (2011), and ($ii$) the regulatory network involved in the control of the cell cycle and cell differentiation in the Caenorhabditis elegans vulva precursor cells proposed by Weinstein et al. (2015). In both cases, we uncover all possible limit cycle structures for these networks under sequential updates. Specifically, for the lac operon model, rather than examining all $10! > 3.6 \cdot 10^6$ sequential update orders, we demonstrate that it is sufficient to consider $344$ representative update orders, and, more notably, that these $344$ representatives give rise to $4$ distinct attractor structures. A similar analysis performed for the C. elegans model demonstrates that it has precisely $125$ distinct attractor structures. We conclude with observations on the variety and distribution of the models' attractor structures and use the results to discuss their robustness.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.