Paper detail

Attention-Enhanced Cross-Task Network for Analysing Multiple Attributes of Lung Nodules in CT

Accurate characterisation of visual attributes such as spiculation, lobulation, and calcification of lung nodules is critical in cancer management. The characterisation of these attributes is often subjective, which may lead to high inter- and intra-observer variability. Furthermore, lung nodules are often heterogeneous in the cross-sectional image slices of a 3D volume. Current state-of-the-art methods that score multiple attributes rely on deep learning-based multi-task learning (MTL) schemes. These methods, however, extract shared visual features across attributes and then examine each attribute without explicitly leveraging their inherent intercorrelations. Furthermore, current methods either treat each slice with equal importance without considering their relevance or heterogeneity, which limits performance. In this study, we address these challenges with a new convolutional neural network (CNN)-based MTL model that incorporates multiple attention-based learning modules to simultaneously score 9 visual attributes of lung nodules in computed tomography (CT) image volumes. Our model processes entire nodule volumes of arbitrary depth and uses a slice attention module to filter out irrelevant slices. We also introduce cross-attribute and attribute specialisation attention modules that learn an optimal amalgamation of meaningful representations to leverage relationships between attributes. We demonstrate that our model outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods at scoring attributes using the well-known public LIDC-IDRI dataset of pulmonary nodules from over 1,000 patients. Our model also performs competitively when repurposed for benign-malignant classification. Our attention modules also provide easy-to-interpret weights that offer insights into the predictions of the model.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.