Paper detail

Attack detection based on machine learning algorithms for different variants of Spectre attacks and different Meltdown attack implementations

To improve the overall performance of processors, computer architects use various performance optimization techniques in modern processors, such as speculative execution, branch prediction, and chaotic execution. Both now and in the future, these optimization techniques are critical for improving the execution speed of processor instructions. However, researchers have discovered that these techniques introduce hidden inherent security flaws, such as meltdown and ghost attacks in recent years. They exploit techniques such as chaotic execution or speculative execution combined with cache-based side-channel attacks to leak protected data. The impact of these vulnerabilities is enormous because they are prevalent in existing or future processors. However, until today, meltdown and ghost have not been effectively addressed, but instead, multiple attack variants and different attack implementations have evolved from them. This paper proposes to optimize four different hardware performance events through feature selection and use machine learning algorithms to build a real-time detection mechanism for Spectre v1,v2,v4, and different implementations of meltdown attacks, ultimately achieving an accuracy rate of over 99\%. In order to verify the practicality of the attack detection model, this paper is tested with a variety of benign programs and different implementations of Spectre attacks different from the modeling process, and the absolute accuracy also exceeds 99\%, showing that this paper can cope with different attack variants and different implementations of the same attack that may occur daily.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.