Paper detail

Atoms in molecules from alchemical perturbation density functional theory

Based on thermodynamic integration we introduce atoms in molecules (AIM) using the orbital-free framework of alchemical perturbation density functional theory (APDFT). Within APDFT, atomic energies and electron densities in molecules are arbitrary because any arbitrary reference system and integration path can be selected as long as it meets the boundary conditions. We choose the uniform electron gas as the most generic reference, and linearly scale up all nuclear charges, situated at any query molecule's atomic coordinates. Within the approximations made when calculating one-particle electron densities, this choice affords exact and unambiguous definitions of energies and electron densities of AIMs We illustrate the approach for neutral iso-electronic diatomics (CO, N$_2$, BF), various small molecules with different electronic hybridisation states of carbon (CH$_4$, C$_2$H$_6$, C$_2$H$_4$, C$_2$H$_2$, HCN), and for all the possible BN doped mutants connecting benzene to borazine (C$_{2n}$B$_{3-n}$N$_{3-n}$H$_6$, $0 \le n \le 3$). Analysis of the numerical results obtained suggests that APDFT based AIMs enable meaningful and new interpretations of molecular energies and electron densities.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.