Paper detail

Atomization energies of the carbon clusters Cn (n=2--10) revisited by means of W4 theory as well as density functional, Gn, and CBS methods

The thermochemistry of the carbon clusters C$_n$ (n=2--10) has been revisited by means of W4 theory and W3.2lite theory. Particularly the larger clusters exhibit very pronounced post-CCSD(T) correlation effects. Despite this, our best calculated total atomization energies agree surprisingly well with 1991 estimates obtained from scaled CCD(ST)/6-31G* data. Accurately reproducing the small singlet-triplet splitting in C$_2$ requires inclusion of connected quintuple and sextuple excitations. Post-CCSD(T) correlation effects in C$_4$ stabilize the linear form. Linear/cyclic equilibria in C$_6$, C$_8$, and C$_{10}$ are not strongly affected by connected quadruples, but they are affected by higher-order triples, which favor polyacetylenic rings but disfavor cumulenic ones. Near the CCSD(T) basis set limit, C$_{10}$ does undergo bond angle alternation in the bottom-of-the-well structure, although it is expected to be absent in the vibrationally averaged structure. The thermochemistry of these systems, and particularly the longer linear chains, is a particularly difficult test for density functional methods. Particularly for the smaller chains and the rings, double-hybrid functionals clearly outperform convential DFT functionals for these systems. Among compound thermochemistry schemes, G4 clearly outperforms the other members of the G$n$ family. Our best estimates for total atomization energies at 0 K should be reliable to 1 kJ/mol up to C$_5$ inclusive, and to better than 1 kcal/mol up to C$_9$ inclusive.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.