Paper detail

Atomic twin-beams and violation of a motional-state Bell inequality from a phase-fluctuating quasi-condensate source

We investigate the dynamics of atomic twin beams produced from a phase-fluctuating source, specifically a 1D Bose gas in the quasi-condensate regime, motivated by the experiment reported in Nature Physics 7, 608 (2011). A short-time analytic model is constructed, which is a modified version of the undepleted pump approximation widely used in quantum and atom optics, except that here we take into account the initial phase fluctuations of the pump source as opposed to assuming long-range phase coherence. We use this model to make quantitative and qualitative predictions of how phase-fluctuations of the source impact the two-particle correlations of scattered atom-pairs. The model is benchmarked against detailed numerical simulations using stochastic phase-space methods, and is shown to validate the intuitive notion that the broadening of momentum-space correlation functions between atoms scattered from a quasi-condensate is driven by the broadened momentum width of the source compared to a true phase coherent condensate. Finally, we combine these theoretical tools and results to investigate the effect phase fluctuations of the twin-beam source can have on a proposed demonstration of a violation of a Bell inequality, which intrinsically relies on phase-sensitive pair correlations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.