Paper detail

Atomic Structure of Steps on 180^o Ferroelectric Domain Walls in PbTiO_3

Using the method of anharmonic lattice statics, we calculate the equilibrium structure of steps on 180^o ferroelectric domain walls (DW) in PbTiO_3. We consider three different types of steps: i) Ti-Ti step that joins a Ti-centered DW to a Ti-centered DW, (ii) Pb-Pb step that joins a Pb-centered DW to a Pb-centered DW, and (iii) Pb-Ti step that joins a Pb-centered DW to a Ti-centered DW. We show that atomic distortions due to these steps broaden a DW but are localized, i.e., they are confined to regions with dimensions of a few lattice spacings. We see that a step locally thickens the domain wall; the defective domain wall is two to three times thicker than the perfect domain wall depending on the step type. We also observe that steps distort the polarization distribution in a mixed Bloch-Néel like way; polarization rotates out of the domain wall plane near the steps. Our calculations show that Pb-Pb steps have the lowest static energy.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.