Paper detail

Atomic Structure of Hematite ($α$-Fe$_2$O$_3$) Nanocube Surface; Synchrotron X-ray Diffraction Study

Atomic structure of a mono-dispersive hematite ($α$-Fe$_2$O$_3$) nanocube $(0 1\bar1 2)$ surface was determined with synchrotron X-ray diffraction. The $α$-Fe$_2$O$_3$ nanocubes were prepared through a hydrothermal process and a single layer of nanocubes was deposited on a silicon substrate with a drop cast method. The alignment of nanocubes with their $(0 1\bar1 2)$ surfaces parallel to the substrate is confirmed with grazing incidence X-ray diffraction. Specular crystal truncation rods (CTR's) from as-prepared and vacuum annealed nanocube surfaces have been measured and they are drastically different from previously reported CTR's from macroscopic single crystal $(0 1\bar1 2)$ surfaces. The measured CTR's from nanocube surfaces are explained well with the atomic structure models of half of atoms in top Fe layer being missing while extra oxygen-layers cover the half-missing Fe layer. An acidic environment during hydrothermal nanocube synthesis process is proposed as the main cause of the difference.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.