Paper detail

Atomic-scale investigation of the irradiation-resistant effect of symmetric tilt grain boundaries of Fe-Ni-Cr alloy

In this paper, the Fe-20Ni-25Cr alloy that is used for fuel cladding or pressure vessels with various grain boundaries (GBs) was investigated by employing molecular dynamics simulations. The bi-crystals comprised of Σ3(111), Σ3(112), Σ9(114), Σ11(113), Σ19(116), and Σ17(223) types GBs were considered to systematically examine the interplay between irradiation defects, irradiation microstructure evolution under stress, and irradiation mechanical properties with irradiation intensity, coincidence site lattice parameter, tilt angle, and GB thickness. It is found that irradiated vacancies and interstitials are annihilated by competitive GB absorption and recombination. Bias absorption of interstitials is observed for most bi-crystals except Σ3(111) and Σ11(113) at 15 keV incident energy, and results in abundant residual vacancies clusters in grain interior. In addition, different GBs exhibit quite diverse irradiation defect sink ability, and the number of residual vacancies is inversely related to the GB thickness, where Σ3(111) and Σ11(113) GBs with narrow GB thickness are weak in defect absorption and the others are strong. Furthermore, uniaxial tensile simulations perpendicular to the GB reveal that all of the mechanical performance of bi-crystals deteriorates after irradiation, which originates from dislocation propagation facilitated by irradiation defect clusters. In particular, regardless of whether the irradiation is applied, the maximum tensile strain, toughness, and Youngs modulus are monotonically correlated with GB tilt angle, while the ultimate tensile strength is stable for larger GB CSL parameter. Finally, on the basis of the evolution of the irradiation defects, microstructures, and mechanical performances, we proposed guidelines of rational design of irradiation-resistant Fe-Ni-Cr alloy.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.