Paper detail

Atomic-scale Electronic Structure of the Cuprate Pair Density Wave State Coexisting with Superconductivity

The defining characteristic of hole-doped cuprates is $d$-wave high temperature superconductivity. However, intense theoretical interest is now focused on whether a pair density wave state (PDW) could coexist with cuprate superconductivity (D. F. Agterberg et al., Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 11, 231 (2020)). Here, we use a strong-coupling mean-field theory of cuprates, to model the atomic-scale electronic structure of an eight-unit-cell periodic, $d$-symmetry form factor, pair density wave (PDW) state coexisting with $d$-wave superconductivity (DSC). From this PDW+DSC model, the atomically-resolved density of Bogoliubov quasiparticle states N(r,E) is predicted at the terminal BiO surface of Bi$_2$Sr$_2$CaCu$_2$O$_8$ and compared with high-precision electronic visualization experiments using spectroscopic imaging STM. The PDW+DSC model predictions include the intra-unit-cell structure and periodic modulations of N(r,E), the modulations of the coherence peak energy $Δ_p$ (r), and the characteristics of Bogoliubov quasiparticle interference in scattering-wavevector space (q-space). Consistency between all these predictions and the corresponding experiments indicates that lightly hole-doped Bi$_2$Sr$_2$CaCu$_2$O$_8$ does contain a PDW+DSC state. Moreover, in the model the PDW+DSC state becomes unstable to a pure DSC state at a critical hole density p*, with empirically equivalent phenomena occurring in the experiments. All these results are consistent with a picture in which the cuprate translational symmetry breaking state is a PDW, the observed charge modulations are its consequence, the antinodal pseudogap is that of the PDW state, and the cuprate critical point at p* ~ 19% occurs due to disappearance of this PDW.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.