Paper detail

Atomic-scale analysis of liquid-gallium embrittlement of aluminum grain boundaries

In this work, we explore the role of atomistic-scale energetics on liquid-metal embrittlement of Al due to Ga. Ab initio and molecular mechanics were employed to probe the binding energies of vacancies and segregation energies of Ga for <100>, <110> and <111> STGBs in Al. We found that the GB local arrangements and resulting structural units have a significant influence on the magnitude of vacancy binding energies. For example, the mean vacancy binding energy for <100>, <110>, and <111> STGBs at 1st layer was found to be -0.63 eV, -0.26 eV, and -0.60 eV. However, some GBs exhibited vacancy binding energies closer to bulk values, indicating interfaces with zero sink strength, i.e., these GBs may not provide effective pathways for vacancy diffusion. The results from the present work showed that the GB structure and the associated free volume also play significant roles in Ga segregation and the subsequent embrittlement of Al. The Ga mean segregation energy for <100>, <110> and <111> STGBs at 1st layer was found to be -0.23 eV, -0.12 eV and -0.24 eV, respectively, suggesting a stronger correlation between the GB structural unit, its free volume, and segregation behavior. Furthermore, as the GB free volume increased, the difference in segregation energies between the 1st layer and the 0th layer increased. Thus, the GB character and free volume provide an important key to understanding the degree of anisotropy in various systems. The overall characteristic Ga absorption length scale was found to be about ~10, 8, and 12 layers for <100>, <110>, and <111> STGBs, respectively. Also, a few GBs of different tilt axes with relatively high segregation energies (between 0 and -0.1 eV) at the boundary were also found. This finding provides a new atomistic perspective to the GB engineering of materials with smart GB networks to mitigate or control LME and more general embrittlement phenomena in alloys.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.