Paper detail

Atmospheric neutrinos as a probe of eV^2-scale active-sterile oscillations

The down-going atmospheric ν_μ and {\bar{ν_μ}} fluxes can be significantly altered due to the presence of eV^2-scale active-sterile oscillations. We study the sensitivity of a large Liquid Argon detector and a large magnetized iron detector (like the proposed ICAL at INO) to these oscillations. Such oscillations are indicated by results from LSND, and more recently, from MiniBooNE and from reanalyses of reactor experiments following recent recalculations of reactor fluxes. There are other tentative indications of the presence of sterile states in both the νand {\barν} sectors as well. Using the allowed sterile parameter ranges in a 3+1 mixing framework in order to test these results, we perform a fit assuming active-sterile oscillations in both the muon neutrino and antineutrino sectors, and compute oscillation exclusion limits using atmospheric down-going muon neutrino and anti-neutrino events. We find that (for both ν_μ and {\bar{ν_μ}}) a Liquid Argon detector, an ICAL-like detector or a combined analysis of both detectors with an exposure of 1 Mt yr provides significant sensitivity to regions of parameter space in the range 0.1 < Δm^2 < 5 eV^2 for \sin^2 2Θ_{μμ}\geq 0.08. Thus atmospheric neutrino experiments can provide complementary coverage in these regions, improving sensitivity limits in combination with bounds from other experiments on these parameters. We also analyse the bounds using muon antineutrino events only and compare them with the results from MiniBooNE.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.