Paper detail

Atmospheric Density Uncertainty Quantification for Satellite Conjunction Assessment

Conjunction assessment requires knowledge of the uncertainty in the predicted orbit. Errors in the atmospheric density are a major source of error in the prediction of low Earth orbits. Therefore, accurate estimation of the density and quantification of the uncertainty in the density is required. Most atmospheric density models, however, do not provide an estimate of the uncertainty in the density. In this work, we present a new approach to quantify uncertainties in the density and to include these for calculating the probability of collision Pc. For this, we employ a recently developed dynamic reduced-order density model that enables efficient prediction of the thermospheric density. First, the model is used to obtain accurate estimates of the density and of the uncertainty in the estimates. Second, the density uncertainties are propagated forward simultaneously with orbit propagation to include the density uncertainties for Pc calculation. For this, we account for the effect of cross-correlation in position uncertainties due to density errors on the Pc. Finally, the effect of density uncertainties and cross-correlation on the Pc is assessed. The presented approach provides the distinctive capability to quantify the uncertainty in atmospheric density and to include this uncertainty for conjunction assessment while taking into account the dependence of the density errors on location and time. In addition, the results show that it is important to consider the effect of cross-correlation on the Pc, because ignoring this effect can result in severe underestimation of the collision probability.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.