Paper detail

Atmosphere Models of Brown Dwarfs Irradiated by White Dwarfs: Analogues for Hot and Ultra-Hot Jupiters

Irradiated brown dwarfs (BDs) provide natural laboratories to test our understanding of substellar and irradiated atmospheres. A handful of short-period BDs around white dwarfs (WDs) have been observed, but the uniquely intense UV-dominated irradiation presents a modeling challenge. Here, we present the first fully self-consistent 1D atmosphere models that take into account the UV irradiation's effect on the object's temperature structure. We explore two BD-WD systems, namely WD-0137-349 and EPIC-212235321. WD-0137-349B has an equilibrium temperature that would place it in the transition between hot and ultra-hot Jupiters, while EPIC-212235321B has an equilibrium temperature higher than all ultra-hot Jupiters except KELT-9b. We explore some peculiar aspects of irradiated BD atmospheres and show that existing photometry can be well-fit with our models. Additionally, the detections of atomic emission lines from these BDs can be explained by a strong irradiation-induced temperature inversion, similar to inversions recently explored in ultra-hot Jupiters. Our models of WD-0137-349B can reproduce the observed equivalent width of many but not all of these atomic lines. We use the observed photometry of these objects to retrieve the temperature structure using the PHOENIX ExoplaneT Retrieval Algorithm (PETRA) and demonstrate that the structures are consistent with our models, albeit somewhat cooler at low pressures. We then discuss the similarities and differences between this class of irradiated brown dwarf and the lower-mass ultra-hot Jupiters. Lastly, we describe the behavior of irradiated BDs in color-magnitude space to show the difficulty in classifying irradiated BDs using otherwise well-tested methods for isolated objects.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.