Paper detail

Asynchronous Variance-reduced Block Schemes for Composite Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization: Block-specific Steplengths and Adapted Batch-sizes

We consider the minimization of a sum of an expectation-valued coordinate-wise $L_i$-smooth nonconvex function and a nonsmooth block-separable convex regularizer. We propose an asynchronous variance-reduced algorithm, where in each iteration, a single block is randomly chosen to update its estimates by a proximal variable sample-size stochastic gradient scheme, while the remaining blocks are kept invariant. Notably, each block employs a steplength that is in accordance with its block-specific Lipschitz constant while block-specific batch-sizes are random variables updated at a rate that grows either at a geometric or polynomial rate with the (random) number of times that block is selected. We show that every limit point for almost every sample path is a stationary point and establish the ergodic non-asymptotic rate $\mathcal{O}(1/K) $. Iteration and oracle complexity to obtain an $ε$-stationary point are shown to be $\mathcal{O}(1/ε)$ and $\mathcal{O}(1/ε^2)$, respectively. Furthermore, under a $ μ$-proximal Polyak-Łojasiewicz (PL) condition with the batch size increasing at a geometric rate, we prove that the suboptimality diminishes at a {\em geometric} rate, the {\em optimal} deterministic rate while iteration and oracle complexity to obtain an $ε$-optimal solution are proven to be $\mathcal{O}( (L_{\rm max}/μ) \ln(1/ε))$ and $\mathcal{O}\left((L_{\rm ave}/μ) (1/ε)^{1+c} \right)$ with $c\geq 0$, respectively. In pursuit of less aggressive sampling rates, when the batch sizes increase at a polynomial rate of degree $v \geq 1$, suboptimality decays at a corresponding polynomial rate while the iteration and oracle complexity to obtain an $ε-$optimal solution are provably $\mathcal{O} ( v(1/ε)^{1/v})$ and $\mathcal{O} \left(e^v v^{2v+1}(1/ε)^{1+1/v}\right)$, respectively.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.