Asymptotics of Moore exponent sets

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Abstract

Let nn be a positive integer and II a kk-subset of integers in [0,n−1][0,n-1]. Given a kk-tuple A=(α0,⋯ ,αk−1)∈FqnkA=(α_0, \cdots, α_{k-1})\in \mathbb{F}^k_{q^n}, let MA,IM_{A,I} denote the matrix (αiqj)(α_i^{q^j}) with 0≤i≤k−10\leq i\leq k-1 and j∈Ij\in I. When I={0,1,⋯ ,k−1}I=\{0,1,\cdots, k-1\}, MA,IM_{A,I} is called a Moore matrix which was introduced by E. H. Moore in 1896. It is well known that the determinant of a Moore matrix equals 00 if and only if α0,⋯ ,αk−1α_0,\cdots, α_{k-1} are Fq\mathbb{F}_q-linearly dependent. We call II that satisfies this property a Moore exponent set. In fact, Moore exponent sets are equivalent to maximum rank-distance (MRD) code with maximum left and right idealisers over finite fields. It is already known that I={0,⋯ ,k−1}I=\{0,\cdots, k-1\} is not the unique Moore exponent set, for instance, (generalized) Delsarte-Gabidulin codes and the MRD codes recently discovered by Csajbók, Marino, Polverino and the second author both give rise to new Moore exponent sets. By using algebraic geometry approach, we obtain an asymptotic classification result: for q>5q>5, if II is not an arithmetic progression, then there exist an integer NN depending on II such that II is not a Moore exponent set provided that n>Nn>N.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.