Paper detail

Asymptotically Optimal Matching of Multiple Sequences to Source Distributions and Training Sequences

Consider a finite set of sources, each producing i.i.d. observations that follow a unique probability distribution on a finite alphabet. We study the problem of matching a finite set of observed sequences to the set of sources under the constraint that the observed sequences are produced by distinct sources. In general, the number of sequences $N$ may be different from the number of sources $M$, and only some $K \leq \min\{M,N\}$ of the observed sequences may be produced by a source from the set of sources of interest. We consider two versions of the problem -- one in which the probability laws of the sources are known, and another in which the probability laws of the sources are unspecified but one training sequence from each of the sources is available. We show that both these problems can be solved using a sequence of tests that are allowed to produce "no-match" decisions. The tests ensure exponential decay of the probabilities of incorrect matching as the sequence lengths increase, and minimize the "no-match" decisions. Both tests can be implemented using variants of the minimum weight matching algorithm applied to a weighted bipartite graph. We also compare the performances obtained by using these tests with those obtained by using tests that do not take into account the constraint that the sequences are produced by distinct sources. For the version of the problem in which the probability laws of the sources are known, we compute the rejection exponents and error exponents of the tests and show that tests that make use of the constraint have better exponents than tests that do not make use of this information.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.