Paper detail

Asymptotically Optimal Locally Private Heavy Hitters via Parameterized Sketches

We present two new local differentially private algorithms for frequency estimation. One solves the fundamental frequency oracle problem; the other solves the well-known heavy hitters identification problem. Consistent with prior art, these are randomized algorithms. As a function of failure probability~$β$, the former achieves optimal worst-case estimation error for every~$β$, while the latter is optimal when~$β$ is at least inverse polynomial in~$n$, the number of users. In both algorithms, server running time is~$\tilde{O}(n)$ while user running time is~$\tilde{O}(1)$. Our frequency-oracle algorithm achieves lower estimation error than the prior works of Bassily et al. (NeurIPS 2017). On the other hand, our heavy hitters identification method is as easily implementable as as TreeHist (Bassily et al., 2017) and has superior worst-case error, by a factor of $Ω(\sqrt{\log n})$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.