Paper detail

Asymptotic probabilities of extension properties and random $l$-colourable structures

We consider a set $\mbK = \bigcup_{n \in \mbbN}\mbK_n$ of {\em finite} structures such that all members of $\mbK_n$ have the same universe, the cardinality of which approaches $\infty$ as $n\to\infty$. Each structure in $\mbK$ may have a nontrivial underlying pregeometry and on each $\mbK_n$ we consider a probability measure, either the uniform measure, or what we call the {\em dimension conditional measure}. The main questions are: What conditions imply that for every extension axiom $φ$, compatible with the defining properties of $\mbK$, the probability that $φ$ is true in a member of $\mbK_n$ approaches 1 as $n \to \infty$? And what conditions imply that this is not the case, possibly in the strong sense that the mentioned probability approaches 0 for some $φ$? If each $\mbK_n$ is the set of structures with universe ${1, ..., n}$, in a fixed relational language, in which certain "forbidden" structures cannot be weakly embedded and $\mbK$ has the disjoint amalgamation property, then there is a condition (concerning the set of forbidden structures) which, if we consider the uniform measure, gives a dichotomy; i.e. the condition holds if and only if the answer to the first question is `yes'. In general, we do not obtain a dichotomy, but we do obtain a condition guaranteeing that the answer is `yes' for the first question, as well as a condition guaranteeing that the answer is `no'; and we give examples showing that in the gap between these conditions the answer may be either `yes' or `no'. This analysis is made for both the uniform measure and for the dimension conditional measure. The later measure has closer relation to random generation of structures and is more "generous" with respect to satisfiability of extension axioms.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.